To Prorogue or Not to Prorogue: Trudeau’s Titanic Hits a Fiscal Iceberg

With the Liberals in freefall, a ticking fiscal clock, and Jagmeet Singh playing kingmaker, Trudeau faces a political and financial cliffhanger that could reshape Canada’s future—or sink it entirely.

Alright, folks, let’s dive into the latest episode of the Canadian soap opera, brought to you by Justin Trudeau and his merry band of clueless bureaucrats. Many of you have been flooding my comment section asking about the Conservatives’ push to fast-track a vote of no confidence. “But Dan,” you say, “can’t Trudeau just prorogue Parliament and dodge the whole thing?” And you know what? You’re absolutely right. He could pull that move. He’s done it before when the We Charity scandal hit. It’s his favorite trick—shut down Parliament, take a vacation, and hope Canadians forget how bad he’s been. But let me tell you something: proroguing Parliament right now is a terrible move, and here’s why.

First off, let’s get this straight: Trudeau is backed into a corner. The fiscal year ends on March 31, 2025, and if the government doesn’t pass something called Interim Supply by then, it’s game over. What’s Interim Supply, you ask? Think of it as a financial Band-Aid, a temporary allowance to keep the government running until the full budget is passed in June. Without it, they can’t pay their bills. The lights go off. The government shuts down. It’s like Trudeau trying to run Canada on a maxed-out credit card, but the bank’s finally calling to say, “Nope, you’re done.”

Now, here’s the kicker: even if Trudeau prorogues Parliament, he still needs to pass Interim Supply by March 31. That’s non-negotiable. And guess what? The Liberals only have 26 days left in the House of Commons to do it. Most of those days are in February, with just a handful in March. So while Trudeau might be tempted to hit the pause button, all he’s doing is delaying the inevitable. It’s like putting off a root canal—you still have to face the pain eventually.

But prorogation isn’t just a logistical nightmare; it’s a political one too. Let’s be honest—shutting down Parliament right now would make Trudeau look weak. Canadians are already fed up with his lack of accountability, and this would just be another example of him running from his problems. It’s the political equivalent of a teenager hiding under the covers because they didn’t study for their final exam. Not a good look for someone who’s supposed to be leading a country.

And let’s not forget the optics. If Trudeau pulls this stunt, it’s going to embolden the Conservatives. They’ll hammer him for ducking responsibility, and they’ll be right to do it. A vote of no confidence might be bold, but it’s also a calculated move. The Conservatives know the Liberals are in freefall. The latest Angus Reid poll has the Liberals at a pathetic 16%. That’s not just bad; that’s embarrassing. Meanwhile, the Conservatives are sitting at 45%. Pierre Poilievre is practically measuring the drapes at 24 Sussex.

Enter Jagmeet Singh, the self-proclaimed kingmaker who’s polling higher than Trudeau right now. Yes, the NDP—the NDP!—is actually outpacing the Liberals in some polls. And Singh? He’s loving it. He’s been strutting around telling everyone he’s going to be Canadas next leader. But let’s be honest: Singh’s dream of becoming Prime Minister is about as realistic as Trudeau’s dream of balancing a budget, but hey, let the guy have his moment.

Here’s the real question: will Singh back Trudeau when it counts? That’s like asking if a dog will chase its tail. Singh’s got leverage, and he knows it. He could use this moment to squeeze concessions out of Trudeau, push him closer to the door, or just sit back and let the Liberals flail. After all, why save a drowning man when you can wait for the rescue spotlight to shine on you instead?

But let’s not sugarcoat this. If Singh plays hardball and Trudeau can’t secure his support, the Liberals could face a vote of no confidence. That means an election—a snap election in the middle of this circus. And let me tell you, the Liberals are in no shape to fight one. With the Conservatives at 45% in the polls and Trudeau’s personal approval in the basement, this government isn’t just weak—it’s on life support.

Now, some of you are saying, “What if they replace Trudeau? Wouldn’t that help?” Sure, the Liberals could fast-track a leadership race or shove Chrystia Freeland into the spotlight. But let’s get real—Freeland isn’t the answer. She’s been Trudeau’s number two for years, cheerleading every disastrous policy this government has rolled out. From the $65 billion budget blowout to fraudulent COVID loans to a carbon tax that’s crushing small businesses, Freeland’s fingerprints are all over this mess.

The Liberals’ big strategy would be to play the identity politics card. “Chrystia Freeland: Canada’s First Female Prime Minister!” The media would eat it up. They’d call it groundbreaking. Revolutionary. But here’s the problem: Canadians don’t care about labels right now. They care about putting food on the table, paying their bills, and keeping their businesses alive. And Freeland? She’s not going to fix any of that. She’s Trudeau in a different suit, and everyone knows it.

But what about Mark Carney? Now there’s someone who’s smart enough to see the writing on the wall. Carney isn’t stepping in to save this sinking ship—he’s waiting for the Titanic to hit the ocean floor before leading the rescue mission. Why inherit Trudeau’s disasters when he can swoop in post-election, when the dust has settled and the party is desperate for a savior? He knows that taking over now would be political suicide. Freeland might be willing to go down with the ship, but Carney’s too smart to strap on a life jacket when he can just show up later with the rescue boats.

So what happens if they prorogue? Well, it’s simple: they’ll delay the problem, waste precious time, and look like cowards in the process. Meanwhile, the clock keeps ticking toward March 31. If they don’t pass Interim Supply by then, the government shuts down. Period. This isn’t just political theater; this is real. The Liberals are playing chicken with the financial stability of the country, and Canadians are the ones who’ll pay the price.

But here’s the most ridiculous part: even if Trudeau’s entire party revolts against him, they can’t actually force him out. That’s right—there’s no mechanism for the caucus to boot him. He can just sit there, smirking, and say, “Nope, I’m staying.” It’s the ultimate dictator move, but with nicer socks.

So what’s the endgame here? If the Liberals had any sense—which they don’t—they’d let Trudeau take the fall. He’s the face of this disaster, and he deserves to go down with the ship. Replace him after the election, when the party can rebuild from the ashes. But instead, they’ll probably shove Freeland into the captain’s chair, let her steer the Titanic straight into the iceberg, and then act shocked when it all goes horribly wrong.

This is Canada’s version of a fiscal cliffhanger, brought to you by the same people who think they can manage your money better than you can. So pour the champagne, play the violin, and let Justin Trudeau captain his sinking ship. The show’s over, folks. Grab your popcorn.