Mark Carney: The Liberals’ Worst Pick to Face Trump
The Worst Possible Matchup Against MAGA Trump—And Canada Will Pay for It
Mark Carney has spent the past several weeks strutting through the mainstream media like he’s Justin Trudeau 2.0—only with better suits and an even worse résumé. The Liberal brand is circling the drain, getting smoked by the Conservatives, and now Carney’s their big fix—their golden boy who’s supposed to take on Donald Trump. But here’s the kicker: he’s not even elected. Because why bother with democracy when you can just waltz in on March 9 and "save the day"?
And the Canadian media—bought and paid for with your tax dollars—couldn’t be happier. They’re puffing him up like a hot air balloon, clutching their government subsidies like life rafts, breathlessly declaring, “He’s the best bet against Trump!” Oh, please.
But here’s what they won’t tell you—because doing actual journalism might cost them their Trudeau cash. I dug into Carney’s history, and let me tell you, this guy is the worst possible matchup against President Trump. The fawning press won’t expose him, but I will. Because this isn’t a résumé—it’s a rap sheet. Let’s break down his liabilities.
Preface : WTF is GFANZ?
Yeah, that’s G-F-A-N-Z, sounds like a bad boy band, but it’s way uglier. GFANZ, for those not in the know, is this massive, UN-backed coalition of financial bigwigs—banks, insurers, asset managers—pushing to “decarbonize” the world economy by 2050. Launched in 2021 at COP26, GFANZ is led by Mark Carney—ex-Bank of England honcho and poster boy for the climate crowd, now slinking off to run as Canada’s next unelected Prime Minister—alongside Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire nanny-stater who wants to ban your Big Gulps. They boasted $130 trillion in assets committed to net-zero, promising to save the planet while strong-arming companies into line.
Sounds noble, right? Wrong. This is a textbook globalist power grab—unelected suits colluding to choke out North American energy, jack up gas prices, and shove woke ESG (environmental, social, governance) nonsense down our throats. It’s not about saving polar bears; it’s about control—centralizing power in the hands of elitists who think they know better than you, the hardworking taxpayer. And it’s falling apart spectacularly, proving the free market still has some fight left.
First, let’s talk about why GFANZ is “bad”—and I mean bad like a rancid steak at a vegan barbecue. Critics, say it’s a “climate cartel” rigging markets against fossil fuels—coal, oil, gas—the lifeblood of North American jobs and energy independence.
The U.S. June 2024 House Judiciary Committee report, “Climate Control: Exposing the Decarbonization Collusion in ESG Investing,” drops bombshell after bombshell. Chaired by Jim Jordan, a GOP bulldog, the committee accuses GFANZ of orchestrating a conspiracy to kneecap industries like oil, aviation, and farming. They claim it’s waging “a Global World War” for net-zero against companies that let you drive your F-150, fly to Vegas, or grill a burger. Over 272,000 documents—2.5 million pages—show GFANZ pressuring firms to ditch fossil fuels, allegedly violating U.S. antitrust laws like the Sherman Act. Banks like JPMorgan and BlackRock, once patriots of profit, now bowing to Carney’s green dogma, hiking energy costs while China keeps pumping coal. The report says GFANZ’s ESG obsession forces “immaterial” carbon disclosures—busywork that wastes corporate time and money on climate fantasies instead of delivering affordable goods. It’s a shakedown, pure and simple, and Fox would say it’s killing the American Dream.
The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust, under Jordan’s iron fist, started sniffing around in 2023. They fired off letters on July 6, 2023, to GFANZ and heavyweights like BlackRock, demanding documents on their ESG collusion. When Carney’s crew slow-walked the responses—classic swamp move—the committee dropped subpoenas on November 1, 2023, and again on September 27, 2024, targeting GFANZ, Ceres, and others. The report’s no slap on the wrist—it hints at beefing up antitrust penalties, meaning fines or jail for the suits behind this. But at least finally, someone’s holding these elitists accountable, exposing how GFANZ’s eco-fanaticism threatens your wallet and freedom.
Enter swamp crea… (ops) I mean Liberal Leader hopeful Mark Carney—June 2024, Carney, GFANZ co-chair, was interviewed—read: grilled—for hours by the Judiciary Committee, alongside Mary Schapiro, ex-SEC chair and GFANZ vice chair. These weren’t public hearings with cameras rolling; they were secretive, lawyer-led sessions. Reuters reported it on June 7, 2024: Carney faced questions about his chats with Wall Street titans like Larry Fink, probing whether GFANZ’s net-zero push was illegal collusion. Sources say he got hours of heat—think a courtroom drama minus the popcorn.
And to think this was done behind closed doors, no cameras, no accountability—just a bunch of lawyers tossing softballs at this climate clown while he spins his fairy tales about GFANZ, this so-called ‘voluntary’ alliance that’s got its boot on the neck of North American energy. Voluntary? Give me a break—He’s not under oath, mind you—no, that’d be too fair. He should’ve been, because these clowns are cooking the books against you, colluding together by jacking up your gas prices under the guise of climate change, and killing jobs while they congratulate each other for saving the planet while they sip lattes at Davos.
Then there’s the bank withdrawals— Major U.S. banks—JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs—bailed from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), a GFANZ subgroup, in late 2024 and early 2025. The Globe and Mail (January 2, 2025) and Financial Post (January 28, 2025) tracked the exodus: Citi, Wells Fargo, and even four of Canada’s Big Five—BMO, CIBC, Scotiabank, TD—ditched too. Why? Antitrust fears, stoked by Jordan’s probe and Trump’s return. The incoming administration’s anti-ESG crusade—think 25% Canadian tariffs and “drill, baby, drill”—made banks sweat.
These banks saw the writing on the wall: GFANZ’s legal risks weren’t worth the green PR. BlackRock’s exit from the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative in December 2024 was the cherry on top—Larry Fink blinking after Texas sued over similar antitrust gripes. ESG Today (January 6, 2025) notes GFANZ restructured, dropping strict rules to keep stragglers,
And now, unbelievably, he wants a promotion. After wrecking economies from London to Ottawa, Carney is eyeing the ultimate prize—Prime Minister of Canada. His backers whisper that he’s the only one who can stand up to Trump, a steady hand against the America First resurgence. But here’s the truth: Carney isn’t Trudeau 2.0—he’s worse. A banker, not a campaigner. A globalist, not a nationalist. A bureaucrat, not a brawler. And if the Liberals think this Davos disciple is the man to take on Trump, they’re in for a rude awakening. Because if there’s one thing the MAGA movement eats for breakfast, it’s weak, unelected elites who think they’re entitled to power. Let’s expose exactly why Carney is the worst possible matchup against Trump.
Why Carney is worse against MAGA Trump
Alright, let’s put you in Donald Trump’s shoes—You’re back in the White House, sworn in for a second term. Meanwhile, Mark Carney waltzes into power on March 9, 2025, after winning the Liberal leadership, unelected by the people but handpicked by the crumbling Trudeau regime. And now, it’s time to play the game— “Lawfare.”
And here’s the perfect target: GFANZ. Carney’s fingerprints are all over this globalist climate cartel, which has allegedly colluded to rig markets, crush North American energy, and violate antitrust laws. There’s a real case to be made—one that could cripple Carney’s agenda before he even gets started.
So, how does Trump pull it off? Let’s game this out. Here’s how lawfare could be used against a Prime Minister Carney and Canada as a proxy—leveraging U.S. legal muscle to expose his role in GFANZ and leverage that against Canadian interests.
Amplify the GFANZ “Climate Cartel” Narrative
Trump starts by directing his DOJ to escalate the House Judiciary Committee’s probe into GFANZ, where Carney testified in June 2024. The June 2024 "Climate Control" report already calls it a “cartel” rigging markets against American energy and consumers—perfect red meat for your base. You’d order Attorney General (say, Matt Gaetz or Pam Bondi) to fast-track an antitrust investigation under the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1). The goal? Paint Carney as the ringleader of a globalist scheme, even if he’s now PM. You’d say on Truth Social: “Crooked Carney ran a climate scam to kill U.S. jobs—now he’s hiding in Canada!”
Directly suing Carney is tricky—he’s got sovereign immunity as PM under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). But you’d sidestep that by targeting GFANZ as an entity, naming him as a key figure in pre-PM actions (2021-2025). The DOJ could allege GFANZ’s net-zero pledges from COP26—Carney’s brainchild—illegally coordinated U.S. banks like JPMorgan and BlackRock to choke fossil fuel investment, costing American jobs. Evidence? Subpoenaed emails from the Judiciary’s 272,000+ documents, maybe showing Carney pushing CEOs like Larry Fink. It’s shaky—GFANZ is voluntary—but you don’t care; it’s lawfare, not a slam dunk.
The Setup: “Carney Killed American Jobs!”
Trump would then frame the narrative. GFANZ, under Carney’s co-chairmanship (2021-2025), pushed 650+ financial firms—including U.S. banks like JPMorgan—to commit to net-zero, nudging them away from fossil fuel investments. The House Judiciary Committee’s June 2024 "Climate Control" report says this “climate cartel” hurt American energy—coal, oil, gas—costing jobs in states like West Virginia, Texas, and Pennsylvania. You’d seize that: Carney’s the villain, Canada’s the puppet master, and U.S. workers are the victims. No nuance—just red meat.
Trump then hit Truth Social: “Crooked Carney ran a globalist scam to kill American energy jobs—thousands gone! Now he’s Canada’s PM, laughing at us. Time to fight back—BIG tariffs!”
Trump calls up his U.S. Trade Representative—let’s say Robert Lighthizer, back for round two—and say, “Bob, Canada’s screwing us. Carney’s climate garbage tanked our jobs—prove it!” Under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. § 2411), you’d order a probe into Canada’s “unfair trade practices.” The claim: Carney’s GFANZ tenure (pre-PM) and Canada’s carbon policies—tied to his Liberal agenda—distorted trade by choking U.S. fossil fuel exports and jobs.
Trump would then announce it at a rally: “Folks, Canada’s PM used his bank buddies to crush our miners, our rig workers—tens of thousands of jobs! We’re investigating—nobody messes with American energy!” USTR gets 90 days to dig—plenty of time to cherry-pick data from the Judiciary’s 272,000 GFANZ docs, showing Canadian banks (RBC, TD) in the Net Zero Banking Alliance cut U.S. coal loans. It’s flimsy—GFANZ isn’t Canada’s government—but you don’t care; it’s a pretext.
While USTR pokes around why wait? Section 301 lets you impose tariffs if you find “unreasonable” practices harming U.S. commerce. Trump declares an “emergency”: “Carney’s climate con hurt our workers—25% tariffs on Canada, starting now!” He then hits Canada’s $500 billion in annual U.S. exports (2024 USTR)—lumber, autos, oil—hard. That’s $125 billion in pain, overnight.
Trump signs the order on live TV, “Canada thought they could kill our jobs and sell us their junk—wrong! 25% tariffs until they fix it. Maybe 50% next—great deal!” He’s tied it to Carney: “He ran GFANZ, starved our oil rigs, now he’s hiding in Ottawa—pay up!”
Then he doubles down with Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act (19 U.S.C. § 1862)—“national security” tariffs. Tell Commerce Secretary (say, Wilbur Ross redux), “Wilbur, Canada’s energy games are a threat—Carney’s GFANZ crippled our fuel supply!” By June 2025, Commerce reports Canadian oil/gas imports—40% of U.S. crude imports (EIA 2024)—are “vulnerable” because GFANZ banks like RBC might restrict pipelines under Carney’s green shadow.
Trump then adds 10% tariffs on Canadian crude: “Carney tried to kill our refineries—10% now, more if he doesn’t back off!” It’s a stretch—Canada didn’t cut supply—but you’d sell it: “Energy security’s jobs, folks—Carney hates both!”
Tariffs in place, you’d call Carney—live on X Spaces: “Mark, your climate scam cost us 50,000 jobs—miners, drillers, truckers! Drop your carbon tax, open your oil sands, or tariffs go to 50%. America First!” He would then flash BLS stats (exaggerated)—say, 20,000 fossil fuel jobs lost since 2021—and blame GFANZ’s “anti-coal conspiracy.” Canada’s $60 billion oil export reliance (2024) means he’d feel it—25% tariffs could tank their GDP 1-2% (per CIBC estimates).
He then brag at Mar-a-Lago and leak it tot he press: “Canada’s begging—Carney’s weak! I’m bringing jobs back—tremendous!”
Canada’s reeling—auto plants in Ontario slow, lumber prices spike in B.C.
Trump would then say, “Carney’s a job-killer! Liberals love tariffs, I guess!”
If Carney caves—say, cuts green regs—He’d crow: “I beat Canada—best deal ever!”
If he doesn’t, hike tariffs to 35%: “He’s stubborn—more jobs for us, less for them!”
Trump would then tie it to the 51st-state fantasy: “Canada’s paying so much, might as well join us—great idea!” MAGA loves it, Rust Belt cheers, and he has leverage—trade concessions or 51st state chaos.
And this is exactly why Mark Carney is the worst possible choice to go up against Trump. He’s got too many liabilities, too much baggage, and too many fingerprints on shady globalist schemes like GFANZ. He’s not just vulnerable—he’s the perfect bogeyman for Trump.
Because let’s be clear—lawfare here isn’t about jail time. It’s about headlines, leverage, and political warfare—just like how Biden’s DOJ went after Trump’s allies to weaken his movement. Trump would turn Carney into MAGA’s ultimate villain, using him to justify Canada trade concessions, energy deals, and whatever else he wants.
Mark my words: if Carney becomes Prime Minister, Canada will pay. Trump will make sure of it—leveraging every bit of Carney’s record to squeeze Ottawa like never before.
Interesting... makes you wonder if a good portion of the motivation for Carney to be PM is Immunity.
Carney won't be PM for long, if he wins the Libs nomination. Will be wonderful to watch the Libs heads explode.
Great article , Carney is a non-starter, and all who push him should be punished.